Experience 2012-3. Section 4.

Results of two (1 and 2) SIBO tests.

Microbiome

1 — May 25, 2012, Aspirate / (*) (CFU/ml)

2 — Jan 28, 2013, Aspirate / biopsy (CFU/ml)

1 — 0

2 — 0 / 0

1 — 0

2 — 0 / 0

1 — 10E7

2 — 0 / 0

1 — 0

2 — 0 / 0

1 — 10E3 (**)

2 — 0 / 0

1 — 10E4 (***)

2 — 0 / 0

Beta-hemolitic Streptococcus
Not group A and not group B

1 — 0

2 — 0 / <10E3 (***)

1 — 0

2 — 0 / 0

Staphylococci S.aureus

1 — 10E3 (***)

2 — 0 / 0

Conditional-pathogenic enterobacterias
( Proteus spp., Klebsiella spp., etc.)

1 — 0

2 — 0 / 0

1 — 10E3 (****)

2 — 0 / 0

1 — 0

2 — <10E3 / 0

1 — 0

2 — 0 / 0

1 — 0

2 — 0 / 0

Diagnosis

SIBO II degree
(ТВС reaches 10E7 at the expense of anaerobic bifidobacterium)

No SIBO
(TBC less 10E5)

  • – from the biopsy no cultures were obtained for unexplained reason

** – according to laboratory tests, it is not E.faecium and, hence, with high probability this is E.faecalis , as in 90% of cases from intestine contents these two kinds of enterococci are cultured only.

*** – have shown sensitivity to Piobacteriophage polyvalent cleared (rus). Also have appeared to be resistant to Streptococcal bacteriophage (rus).

**** – it is a false positive result, because simultaneously lead GC-MS analysis of blood, as well as biopsy has not shown the presence of signs of ostensibly found out Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (at it has a unique marker).

Experience 2012-3. Section 5.

Experience 2012-3. List of all sections.

Scroll to Top